We all aspire to be more productive, procrastinate less, and achieve the things we dream of. We are starting a business, sticking to our weight loss goal and alike. But, it's never that easy for some people. Maybe we are just wired differently, or perhaps we are not approaching the science of habit or just winging it like a college exam. In this post, I am deep diving into the science of patterns. How to begin, maintain, and execute on a high level, why do specific habit-forming techniques work and maybe why others do not.

I am overwhelmed with the abundance of information that is available to me daily... I have this "curious mind" where I learn a little about moving quickly through topics, often not long enough to grasp critical concepts. To bring balance, I need to understand how to form long-lasting habits, and by such, I hope you will find this post interesting and beneficial. Let's make our Habits personal!

Implementation Intention

Psychologist Peter Gollwitzer introduced the habit framing strategy called "Implementation Intention." When situation X arises (cue), I will perform response Y (reward), or put another way, IF {situation} THEN I will {behaviour}.

Forming this habit of a cue will lead to better perception, memory and attention. It's thought that implementation intention, once set, will continue operating non-consciously. This process is called strategic automaticity. The strength of commitment has a strong correlation with the implementation intention. Once the habit is in place, research shows that breaking promises generates a negative feeling, especially if made with others.

Tiny Habits

Another approach is creating Tiny Habits, a process made famous by BJ Fogg that are ridiculously easy to complete. For example, I will read for 5 minutes before bed rather than read until I finish the first chapter, which takes an hour. An example Fogg uses is flossing one tooth. It's such a ridiculous small task you can commit it relatively quickly. The key here is to complete the action and celebrate that action immediately. "Tell yourself you're awesome.”

Fogg argues there are two ways to change a behaviour

  1. Change your environment, which changes your behaviour. This can be difficult,  especially in social settings.
  2. Make the behaviour tiny enough, and it’s easy to repeat, making it a habit.

Motivation and willpower alone won't get you to create or sustain that behaviour change. Focusing on the outcome is not the preferred strategy in Fogg’s argument, instead of focusing on the behaviours that eventually lead to the goal. For example, using weight loss, rather than thinking about the final result, losing 25 pounds, you think about the behaviours you can accomplish, eating better, exercising, sleeping well, etc. That is how habits are formed, and behaviours change, according to Fogg.

What causes behaviour change

1. Motivation allows us to do hard things.

2. Ability, the more straightforward action is to do, the more likely we will.

3. Triggers can be used on top of existing behaviours.

Tiny Habit Format

After I “existing habit,”

I will “new tiny behaviour.

Fantasy Realization Theory

FRT is the style of thinking that focuses on the positive aspects of an impending reality and is referred to as free fantasy. FRT is imagined future events that you think about to visualize an outcome—for example, thinking positively about a promotion or successful business. This theory, however, is debated, with some studies showcasing that even though you imagine the future, there is still doubt that in reality, that (vision) may not occur. In contrast, one may think about all the hard work for those future realities to fruition, leading to a lack of motivation.

Mental Contrasting

Comparing and contrasting positive and negative aspects of an impending future is mental contrasting. Mental Contrasting is closely related to FTR in that you weigh the reality versus a goal and what it takes to achieve it. At the core of most mental contrasting interventions is a practice Oettingen refers to as WOOP.

* Wish - future goal,

* Outcome - reaching that goal,

* Obstacles - understand work required to reach the outcome,

* Planning - making an ‘if-then plan to face inevitable challenges.

Scholarly evidence suggests that mental contrasting is a powerful alternative to positive thinking that effectively balances optimistic and realistic perspectives to help us achieve our goals.

Strategize Growth

Rather than going from 0 to 100, try putting in the effort at 20 for the first week. This will form the habit and won't drain the tank. As time passes, raise the intensity sort of speak. A plateau will show itself; sometimes, it's because of boredom rather than a table. Trying to recognize variety is essential to keep us engaged.

A Self Report Index of Habit Strength

Dr so and so argue that habit is a psychological construct, and not simply past behavioural frequency, and should therefore be measured as such. Habits have a history of repetition, and it’s not the history that enforced the habit but the specific pairing of being satisfied with the response to a particular cue. The association of a goal and an action. According to this study, it takes on average 66 days to form a habit.

An example was given which may help explain this process. An individual goes to the bus stop at 8 am, which enables this person to arrive at work on time. That positive experience then creates a cue for the individual to always be at the bus stop at 8 am. Therefore, if the goal of arriving at work is the intention, the cue will automatically trigger the behaviour (8 am bus stop).

The Self Report Index comprises 12 statements, which you answer between 1 - 7, 1 being strongly disagreed vs 7 strongly agreeing.


The idea would be to answer all these questions when you think of a behaviour. Total points equal 84. Tally up your score and compare it to the 84 points. The higher your number, the more ingrained the habit is. The lower your score, the more you will struggle to continue the habit.

Curiosity

Being a curious individual myself, this post in the American Psychological Association piqued my interest. The post speaks of curiosity and the potential it has to steer individuals away from temptations and towards less tempting ones, according to Evan Polam, Ph.D.

“Peopleseven really require closure when something has piqued their curiosity. They want the information that fills the curiosity gap, and they will go to great lengths to get it.”

In one study conducted in this paper, they gave the participants two fortune cookies. One plain, the other dipped in chocolate with sprinkles. When the researchers didn't say anything 80% of the time, the chocolate cookie was selected. However, when the researchers showed that the plain cookie contained a personal message inside, they chose the essential cookie over 70% of the time.

Perhaps the curiosity gap can be used to benefit society: unhealthy diets or other interventions.

Pavlovian Training (Clicker Training)

Dr. Kare Pryor is known for training animals with the clicker technique. In this study, she teamed up with surgeons to see if using an Operant learning program is more effective than teaching by demonstration.

In this study, researchers studied participants assigned to tying the locking, sliding lock and making a low-angle drill hole. The purpose was to explore the Operant system with acoustic feedback, and the other group was taught via demonstration only. The results were the Operant group 12 participants all tied their knots precisely.

Operant learning occurs as the behaviour is constructed and is highly reinforced with the result being measured, not in the time saved, but in the outcome of an accurately built complex behaviour.


Self-Esteem Games

Researchers identified that people who have insecure feelings also suffer from anxieties about being accepted and respected by their peers. The study focused on increasing self-esteem by utilizing gamification to assist with small behavioural change. Games like Eyespy, where participants would see an image of multiple faces to identify the individual who is smiling out of the group, as the rest were all frowning. The study found that it reduces the attentional bias for rejection with people who have low self-esteem. By ignoring rejection, it could help individuals with low self-esteem in social settings (Source). Researchers indicate that although the findings look promising, they cannot claim the effectiveness of these games in helping an individual with a particular problem.